1. Pillars
  2. Country-led investment for sustainable development, climate, and resilience
  3. Debt, fiscal space, and macroeconomic constraints

Debt, fiscal space, and macroeconomic constraints

Debt sustainability and fiscal space are central to translating the Baku-to-Belém investment agenda into implementation. Meeting estimated investment needs in EMDEs will require substantial debt financing alongside grants, equity, and other capital. Currently, elevated borrowing costs, the risk of further increases in sovereign bond yields, and limited fiscal buffers, all particularly prevalent in EMDEs and climate-vulnerable economies, continue to threaten debt sustainability and constrain investment capacity (IMF, 2026b). The central challenge is to translate debt stabilization into sustainable fiscal space for productive investment while strengthening resilience to future shocks. Affordable borrowing, fiscal capacity, and resilience to economic and climate shocks are therefore critical to countries' capacity to invest.

Status

Debt distress among low-income countries has eased marginally, several major restructuring cases have progressed, and international debt frameworks are evolving. However, high financing costs, weak domestic revenue mobilization, and growing reliance on domestic debt continue to constrain investment capacity. Fiscal consolidation has helped rebuild buffers but has not consistently created space for productive investment, while protection against climate and economic shocks remains limited. Progress is uneven, with lower-income and climate-vulnerable economies facing particularly significant constraints.

Scale

Magnitude relative to the need

Stalled

Debt positions have begun to stabilize, but high financing costs and constrained fiscal space continue to limit public investment. Public and publicly guaranteed external debt in EMDEs (excluding China) reached USD 3 trillion in 2024, and general government debt USD 10.9 trillion (IMF, 2026d). New borrowing from private creditors carried average interest rates of 5.9%, against 3.8% from official creditors, with average maturities of 10 years versus 22 (World Bank, 2026a). Of 144 EMDEs assessed, 59 remain fiscally constrained (Kharas and Sarkar, 2026), while recent tightening in global capital markets is making debt more expensive and raising refinancing risk (IMF, 2026c).

Speed

Pace of reform against what's needed

Steady

Restructuring processes have progressed and international coordination is improving, but recovery of fiscal space and investment capacity remains slow. Low-income countries in debt distress fell from 11 to nine between October 2024 and March 2026, while those at high risk fell only from 24 to 23 (IMF, 2026e). Chad, Zambia, and Ghana have completed G20 Common Framework treatment, with agreement in principle for Ethiopia (IMF, 2026f). Senegal held its first creditor meeting in October 2026 (Shalal A, 2026), and the revised LIC Debt Sustainability Framework is expected to become operational only in the second half of 2027 (IMF, 2026g).

Reach

How far it extends across countries and institutions

Stalled

Improvements remain uneven, with lower-income and climate-vulnerable countries facing the greatest fiscal constraints and the least protection against shocks. In 2024, 63 of 122 developing countries collected less than 15% of GDP in tax revenue (Sawadogo et al., 2026), including 19 of 22 low-income countries (IMF, 2026d). Fewer than 30 of over 200 countries assessed have standalone disaster-risk financing strategies (Glemarec et al., 2025). Climate-resilient debt clauses are available to 45 eligible countries through the World Bank and 12 through the IDB, but uptake remains limited (Cravero et al., 2025; World Bank, 2024a).

Impact

Depth of real world effect

Slow

Debt stabilization and restructuring have reduced immediate pressures in some countries, but evidence of increased investment capacity remains limited. The median low-income country has more than halved its primary deficit from a pandemic peak above 3% of GDP, largely through expenditure-based consolidation rather than stronger revenues (Dielmann et al., 2025). Six major debt-for-nature swaps across five developing countries have retired around USD 5.45 billion in debt since 2020, though volumes remain small relative to needs. Debt-sustainability frameworks are being revised, but integration of investment benefits, public assets, and climate risks remains incomplete (IMF, 2026g; Laskaridis and Zha, 2025).

Action fronts

Climate finance reform advances on five fronts, from replenishing the funds that already exist to reshaping how the whole system works. These are the fronts where Debt, fiscal space, and macroeconomic constraints is making headway.

  • Rebalancing
  • Reshaping

The Path Forward

Debt stabilization must translate into sustainable fiscal space for productive climate and development investment, while strengthening countries' capacity to manage financing risks and shocks.

This requires protecting growth-enhancing and climate-resilient public investment within credible medium-term fiscal frameworks, and integrating domestic debt, public assets, and contingent liabilities into sovereign balance-sheet management. Debt-sustainability frameworks should better capture the long-term benefits of productive investment and the fiscal implications of climate change. Countries also need layered shock-responsive financing, alongside stronger international debt cooperation and borrower-country capacity through the Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable and Borrowers' Platform.

Actors

Cooperation is required between these actors and audiences to drive progress foward in Debt, fiscal space, and macroeconomic constraints .

Borrower-country governments and finance ministries

International Monetary Fund

World Bank

Official and private creditors

Debt, fiscal space, and macroeconomic constraints | Climate Finance Reform Compass